Every digital experience begins with a wait.

Sometimes it’s short enough not to notice—a near-instant display of content and interaction. Other times, it stretches just long enough to break the thread of intent. That gap, between a user’s request and your website’s response, is where performance lives. And increasingly, where revenue lives too.

Teams today can’t afford to treat performance as polish. It’s not a nice-to-have. It’s the delivery system for shareholder value, the front line of user engagement, and a direct driver of search visibility, conversion, and retention. The distance between “looks fast” and “is fast” often determines whether revenue scales or stalls.

And the web is getting faster. Are you keeping up?

‍

The Core Metric: LCP as the New Bar of Entry

Google’s Core Web Vitals initiative defines the current thresholds for performance engineering, but it’s a lagging indicator. Of the three Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS), Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) serves as the foundational metric. It measures the time from navigation to when the largest visual element renders, usually a hero image or headline.

The benchmark for a “good” LCP is 2.5 seconds or less (according to Google), but in practice, this threshold is now just a minimum viable score. In competitive sectors like e-commerce, travel, or anywhere transactions happen online, winners are achieving sub-one-second LCPs. Top-tier properties now consistently serve pages with LCPs under 700 milliseconds.

That delta matters. A site with a 2.4s LCP might technically pass Core Web Vitals. However, a competitor with a 700ms LCP will render first, engage faster, and reap the compound benefits of lower bounce rates, improved SEO rankings, and stronger conversions.

Fast is good. Faster is decisive.

‍

How We Got Here: From Signals to Systems

Performance has been in Google's ranking algorithms since 2010, when it was introduced as a lightweight signal for desktop search. In 2018, mobile speed was added. And by 2025, Core Web Vitals have become deeply embedded in both organic and paid search systems.

These aren’t theoretical adjustments. Google's systems now actively reward fast, stable, and responsive pages. And the effect is compounded across traffic sources. Organic rankings improve. Ad quality scores rise. User behavior strengthens, all rooted in the raw, measurable latency between request and response.

One second of load time impacts everything from search position to bounce rate to checkout completion. As Google's own studies show, pages that take more than 3 seconds to load lose over half their visitors. And with each additional second, conversions drop by up to 20%.

Every interaction begins with a race to render. Every delay creates loss.

‍

The Real Cost of Latency

Let’s bring that into real-world numbers. A platform generating $50 million in online revenue may lose 10–15% of its potential simply from poor load speed. That’s not due to a broken funnel or poor targeting. It’s a direct consequence of slowness.

The impact shows up across the stack:

• Marketing sees lower performance across paid channels due to reduced ad quality scores.
• Sales sees fewer leads converting, especially in enterprise flows with complex journeys.
• Product sees reduced activation from users who never reach the point of value.

Even small inefficiencies scale. A 500ms delay, when multiplied across millions of user sessions per month, results in material drops in revenue. Amazon’s testing found each 100ms of added latency decreased revenue by 1%. Google, years earlier, measured a 20% traffic and revenue loss from adding just 0.5 seconds.

These figures are consistent across time, industry, and delivery platform. Performance leaks revenue. Speed recovers it.

‍

Why Most Architectures Can’t Compete

Achieving sub-second LCP consistently—across geographies, devices, and networks—requires more than frontend optimization. It requires architecture built for speed.

Most legacy stacks aren’t designed for this. Origin latency, network distance, cold starts, hydration lag, and asset bloat all stack up. The traditional request/response cycle involves too many hops, too much serialization, too many middle layers. Pages served from data centers thousands of miles away simply can't match the response time of edge-native stacks.

Even modern frameworks struggle when backed by architectures that separate compute, storage, and delivery. Time is lost chasing coherence between services. By the time the page assembles, the opportunity to deliver immediacy is already gone.

Only a handful of engineering organizations are consistently shipping sub-500ms LCP at scale. Their systems prioritize locality, bundling efficiency, render path clarity, and runtime simplicity. They control what happens between the user’s click and the browser’s first meaningful paint.

This is where the next wave of architecture emerges.

‍

The Rise of New Delivery Models

To compete on performance, more teams are moving to architectural patterns that reduce latency across every layer of the stack. Edge functions, server components, and distributed computing are part of the shift, but architectural consolidation is just as critical.

In the pursuit of speed, many teams instinctively reach for bolt-on solutions, such as Redis, to cache data and reduce perceived database latency. While Redis can be effective in tightly scoped scenarios, its integration introduces additional complexity: new infrastructure, new tooling, and another layer of failure risk. Running Redis in a single location creates latency gaps for globally distributed users. Running Redis in multiple regions introduces replication, consistency, and observability challenges that most teams are not equipped to manage cleanly.

The outcome is often a heavier DevOps load, more intermediary steps between the user and the data, and ultimately, only marginal improvements in perceived performance. What’s missing isn’t compute speed—it’s proximity. The challenge is architectural, not just technical.

The fused stack addresses that head-on. It co-locates compute, data, and API logic into a single runtime that runs close to the user. This eliminates the traditional round-trip delays between frontends, backends, and databases. Fused stacks are not simply optimized; they’re designed from first principles to reduce the number of moving parts between intent and response.

Today, Harper’s fused stack is helping power more than 2% of global e-commerce revenue today, a number that continues to grow. Companies adopting this approach are unlocking performance levels that were previously inaccessible with conventional architectures.

This is a fundamental shift in architecture that brings compute and data together at the edge, enabling fast delivery of statics and dynamic content without relying on brittle cache layers with high eviction rates. Unlike traditional CDNs—which excel at static assets but fall short when real-time data, personalization, or API-driven responses are required—fused systems are designed to serve dynamic content with the same immediacy and efficiency once reserved for static files.

‍

What High-Performing Teams Are Doing

Teams focused on performance leadership are aligning infrastructure with experience. They treat Core Web Vitals as indicators of system quality. Their practices include:

• Measuring real-user LCP and INP across core traffic flows.
• Auditing architectural latency across API, rendering, and storage.
• Include performance budgets into every new feature they deliver
• Designing pages and systems that render meaningfully within under one second, unusually by pre-rendering and caching pages across distributed nodes.
  
  

Performance is a discipline. These teams monitor it like uptime. They assign owners, invest in observability, and refactor ruthlessly when thresholds are breached.

And when they reach the limits of traditional models, they adopt new ones.

‍

Where to Start

The fastest path to performance clarity is measurement. Use tools that expose the reality of what users see, field data over synthetic. Start with the Core Web Vitals report in Search Console, segment by device and geography, and identify the paths that matter most to business value.

For broader visibility—especially when sharing with executive stakeholders—PageSpeed Insights is a valuable companion. It provides a visual, easy-to-digest snapshot of real-world performance across LCP, INP, CLS, and other key metrics. This makes it ideal for illustrating the current state of a site and aligning teams on where improvements are most urgent. It’s also effective for demonstrating progress over time, particularly in quick stand-ups or stakeholder reviews.

Then align on targets. Aim for sub-1s LCP, even if it’s currently out of reach. Let the gap guide your architecture. Prioritize infrastructure that supports low-latency delivery and simple render paths. Integrate testing early, and report performance outcomes alongside product metrics.

Most importantly: treat performance like a product feature. Because it is.

Users experience speed before anything else. When it’s done right, they don’t think about it. They just convert. They stay. They come back.

That’s the business case for speed. And it’s measurable in milliseconds.

‍